Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Crull

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per the addition of reliable sources 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Crull (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:NJOURNALIST. None of the sources available or on the article are discussion in detail, rather just job announcements, failing WP:SIGCOV. John from Idegon (talk) 19:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Which guideline says a sports commentator is not an entertainer? According to Wikipedia, entertainers can be "Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities." I would say she is an opinion maker as she offers commentary. Regardless of how you define her position, I believe the article still passes WP:GNG. Lonehexagon (talk) 01:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am ready and willing to award ten extra points to anyone who can use WP:ACADEMIC or WP:GEOLAND use as a keep rationale for this person, who is clearly WP:JOURNALIST.104.163.158.37 (talk) 05:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. —Bagumba (talk) 08:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.